Taxonomy Tag Cloud

Proving logged technically advanced airplane time for a flight test
Votes
Open
Leave it to the members to ask some really great questions. The one I was asked recently was in reference to 61.129(a)(3)(ii):

>10 hours of training in a complex airplane, a turbine-powered airplane, or a technically advanced airplane (TAA) that meets the requirements of paragraph (j) of this section, or any combination thereof. The airplane must be appropriate to land or sea for the rating sought<

How can one show, or prove, that time was acquired in a technically advanced airplane (TAA)? Good question.

To be a TAA, a specific set of requirements has to be met. I won't list them here, but to the point - just because an airplane is a Cirrus, that does not mean it qualifies as a TAA. Conversely, just because an airplane is a Cessna 152, that doesn't mean it is not a TAA. Installed equipment is the key.

Time logged in a Bonanza is complex time. Time logged in King Air is turbine time. Those are well defined absolutes; time logged in a TAA is not that obvious.

I have yet to see one, and maybe they are out there, but most logbooks do not have a TAA column; so, how can one show, or prove, that time was acquired in a technically advanced airplane? The best answer we came up with was to note it in the remarks or endorsement section in the logbook. One could also create a TAA column in a logbook. That way, when asked by a pilot examiner, FAA Airman Certification, or insurance provider, the time you have logged in TAA can be accurately reported.
 
1 Replies
Votes
1188 Posts
Daddis At AOPA:

 The best answer we came up with was to note it in the remarks or endorsement section in the logbook. One could also create a TAA column in a logbook. That way, when asked by a pilot examiner, FAA Airman Certification, or insurance provider, the time you have logged in TAA can be accurately reported.
 

I concur.  It's something I hadn't thought about, not yet having given anyone training for commercial in a non-complex airplane, but it's a point well taken.